Thursday, August 5, 2010

easterling [introduction].

TERM [network _____].

"Network" can be used to describe the systematic organization of any number of different topics, modes, theories, etc. Hence, the term "network [fill in the blank]" might be appropriately completed using the following: architecture/design/planning/process/analysis/theory/etc. Regardless of the specific subject, a network defines itself through its constituent parts. The individual pieces that make up a network can be dependent, independent, static, or dynamic and yet still contribute to the overall fabric of intelligent connectivity. The "network _____" is the bigger picture, the deeper meaning, the encompassing reality behind the study of simply one object.

TERM [generic optimization].

Heterogeneous to homogeneous, independent to dependent, compartmentalize to generalize, defining to unifying - these terms describe the shift from the specific to the common. Such movement is the result of a desire for "generic optimization" following the theory that mass production and simplification produces efficiency, clarity, and idealized performance. (This conversation can be linked to the previous post on the term "routinization" from De Landa.) Yet, the generic can only be defined in light of the eccentricities that remain/are born after generic optimization occurs. The exception proves the rule, so to speak - you cannot define one without the presence of the other. So while the banal may prove to be idealized, the rouge eccentricities that float along the perimeter are responsible for constantly challenging, testing, and proving the status quo. After all, optimization is ever changing (thanks to market economics), and therefore demands that certain eccentricities are absorbed into the generic mass, evolving it ever so slightly enough to continue its propulsion forward.

ADDITIONAL NOTES.

Do generic optimizations make life easier for the indecisive, uncertain, or over-indulged? Are they limiting to the progress of individuality? Which outweighs which? Perhaps it depends on the individual personality deciding, and if they fall into the category of the generic or the eccentric...

No comments:

Post a Comment